Practice by paper · Finance & Accounting
ACCA AFM: Advanced Financial Management Practice Questions
45 original practice questions for ACCA Advanced Financial Management (AFM), written for this site with full explanations. The real AFM exam uses constructed-response case questions; these multiple-choice questions test the underlying concepts. They are original questions in the style of the syllabus - not taken from any official exam. Use them to test coverage, then confirm details against ACCA's official materials.
Answered 0 · Correct 0
-
Why is net present value (NPV) generally regarded as the superior investment appraisal criterion for shareholder wealth?
Correct answer: B. NPV discounts incremental cash flows at a risk-appropriate opportunity cost of capital, so a positive NPV is a direct estimate of the value created for shareholders, and it handles unconventional cash flow patterns and mutually exclusive choices consistently. It is usually more work, not less, than simpler methods. Far from ignoring the time value of money, discounting is its defining feature, and it can easily disagree with payback, which ignores post-payback cash flows and discounting altogether. -
Adjusted present value (APV) evaluates a project by:
Correct answer: D. APV separates investment and financing decisions: the base case discounts operating cash flows at the ungeared cost of equity reflecting pure business risk, and financing effects are valued separately and added. Discounting everything at the existing WACC is the standard NPV approach, which APV deliberately avoids when gearing changes. APV works with discounted cash flows rather than accounting profit, and it does not involve averaging IRRs of financing options at all. -
In which situation is APV particularly more suitable than a WACC-based NPV?
Correct answer: A. A single WACC assumes the existing capital structure and financing mix persist; that assumption breaks down in leveraged acquisitions, projects that shift gearing materially, or deals with cheap subsidised debt, which is exactly where valuing financing effects separately shines. A small project financed in the existing mix is the textbook case where WACC-NPV works fine. With no tax or special financing there are few side effects to add, removing APV's advantage, and APV highlights financing effects rather than ignoring them. -
Which of the following would typically be valued as a financing side effect within an APV calculation?
Correct answer: C. Side effects are consequences of how the project is financed, not of what it does: interest tax shields, issue costs and cheap-loan benefits all exist only because of the financing choice, so they are valued separately and added to the base case. Salvage value and contribution from sales are operating cash flows belonging in the base-case NPV. Accounting depreciation is not a cash flow at all - only its tax effects matter, and those enter the base-case operating computation. -
Which of the following best describes 'real options' in investment appraisal?
Correct answer: D. Real options are choices attached to real investments: waiting for better information, scaling up on success, switching use, or abandoning on failure. They are valuable precisely because management can adapt after uncertainty unfolds. Exchange-traded commodity options are financial instruments, not project flexibilities. An obligation is the opposite of an option, whose essence is the right without the obligation, and employee share options are a remuneration matter unrelated to project appraisal. -
Why can a conventional NPV analysis understate the value of a project that contains significant flexibility?
Correct answer: B. Standard NPV values one expected path and treats the plan as locked in, so it assigns no worth to the asymmetric payoffs that flexibility creates - cutting losses when things go badly and scaling up when they go well. That is an omission of option value, not double-counting of risk. The discount rate is not systematically too low; the issue is the missing flexibility term. And flexible projects can still fail - flexibility limits downside exposure, it does not eliminate bad outcomes. -
The option to abandon a project for a salvage value is analogous to which financial instrument?
Correct answer: A. Abandonment gives management the right, not the obligation, to give up the project's future cash flows and take the salvage value, mirroring a put where the underlying is the project value and the strike is the salvage amount. A forward would oblige the sale regardless of conditions, destroying the optionality. A call on capacity describes the option to expand, the mirror-image flexibility, and a secured loan is a financing arrangement with no option character for the borrower's investment decision. -
Which statement about the drivers of real option value is correct?
Correct answer: C. Option value grows with volatility and time because the holder captures upside while limiting downside - the asymmetry that makes waiting or staging valuable, and a striking reversal of the usual intuition that risk destroys value. Uncertainty therefore raises rather than reduces deferral value. Time to expiry is a core input, so option B fails. And a project with negative static NPV can still be worth holding for its option value - that is precisely when recognising the option can change the decision. -
When appraising a project in a different industry from the investing company's existing business, the appropriate approach to the discount rate is to:
Correct answer: C. The discount rate must reflect the risk of the project, not of the existing business, so the ungear-regear technique borrows the business risk of industry comparables (asset beta) and re-dresses it in the investor's own financial risk. Using the existing WACC misprices any project whose business risk differs from the current portfolio. The risk-free rate ignores business risk entirely, and an arbitrary premium on a borrowing rate has no link to systematic risk or shareholder required returns. -
What is the key advantage of simulation (Monte Carlo) analysis over single-variable sensitivity analysis in project appraisal?
Correct answer: D. Sensitivity analysis answers 'which single input matters most and how much can it slip before NPV turns negative', but it holds everything else constant and says nothing about likelihood. Simulation's contribution is the combined picture: many variables moving together, yielding a full distribution of NPVs. No technique guarantees outcomes. Simulation requires distributions as inputs rather than removing the need, and option C reverses the actual capabilities of the two methods. -
The three broad approaches to valuing a business are:
Correct answer: A. Valuation methods cluster into what the business owns (net assets), what it will generate (discounted cash flows or capitalised earnings), and what the market pays for similar businesses (multiples). Triangulating across them tests the reasonableness of any single answer. Payback, ARR and IRR are project appraisal criteria, not business valuation families. Machinery cost measures address individual assets rather than a going concern, and cover and liquidity ratios assess financial health, not value. -
The difference between free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) and free cash flow to equity (FCFE) is that:
Correct answer: B. The pairing of cash flow and discount rate must match the claim being valued: firm-level flows with the blended cost of capital give enterprise value, equity-level flows (after interest, debt repayments and new borrowing) with the cost of equity give equity value. Option A states the ownership the wrong way round. For a geared company the two differ by the debt-related flows, so equality fails, and both measures deduct the capital expenditure needed to sustain the business. -
Why might an acquirer rationally pay more than the standalone market value of a target, and what is the accompanying danger?
Correct answer: D. A control premium is economically justified up to the value of synergies and improvements the buyer can realise, so the target can genuinely be worth more in the acquirer's hands. The recurring failure is the winner's curse: contested auctions and optimism push prices to levels where the acquirer's shareholders capture little or nothing. No accounting rule mandates premiums, the price emerges from negotiation rather than the target board's unilateral decree, and EPS accretion is neither guaranteed nor proof of value creation. -
A company is valued by applying a price-earnings multiple taken from a listed 'comparable' company. The most important conceptual limitation of this method is that:
Correct answer: A. A multiple is shorthand for the market's view of the comparator's growth, risk and earnings quality; applying it wholesale assumes the target shares those characteristics, which is rarely exactly true, and unquoted shares usually justify a discount for illiquidity. Private company earnings are obtainable from their accounts, though they may need normalising. The arithmetic is trivially simple - that is part of its appeal - and multiples differ widely across companies, which is precisely why choosing the comparator matters. -
In a discounted cash flow valuation of a going concern, the 'terminal value' typically:
Correct answer: C. Explicit forecasts usually cover a limited number of years, so everything afterwards is compressed into the terminal value; because it is a large slice of most valuations, small changes in the perpetuity growth rate or discount rate move the answer substantially, and sensitivity testing is essential. It is anything but a rounding item. A going-concern terminal value assumes continued operations, not liquidation salvage, and while exit multiples are sometimes used, they should be evidence-based rather than arbitrary. -
In a spin-off (demerger), a parent company:
Correct answer: C. A spin-off separates a business by handing its shares directly to the parent's existing shareholders, who end up holding two companies instead of one; no cash changes hands, and the rationale is usually sharper focus, better managerial accountability or removing a conglomerate discount. A cash sale of a division is a trade divestment, and a public share sale of a subsidiary raises cash and is a different exit route. A share buyback returns cash to shareholders and separates no business at all. -
A financially distressed company proposes a reconstruction in which lenders accept reduced claims and shareholders are heavily diluted. For the scheme to be accepted, the guiding principle is that:
Correct answer: B. A reconstruction is a bargain among claimholders, and each class compares its recovery under the scheme with its likely recovery in a break-up; a viable plan therefore shares the value of survival so every essential class does better than liquidation. Full repayment of lenders is exactly what distress makes impossible. Existing shareholders rank last and typically suffer the greatest dilution rather than guaranteed control, and resuming big dividends would drain the cash the rescue is designed to preserve. -
Beyond the use of debt itself, where does the value created in a successful leveraged buyout mainly come from?
Correct answer: D. The classic LBO value drivers are the tax relief on debt interest, the cash discipline forced by a demanding repayment schedule, and management's meaningful equity stake aligning effort with value. All of these come at the price of elevated distress risk if trading deteriorates. EPS arithmetic does not create economic value by itself, relisting gains are speculative rather than guaranteed, and revaluing assets in the books changes reported numbers, not cash generation. -
A company with a high price-earnings ratio acquires one with a low ratio in a share-for-share deal, and its earnings per share rise immediately. Why should investors treat this 'bootstrapping' effect with caution?
Correct answer: A. Exchanging highly rated paper for lowly rated earnings mechanically lifts EPS even when nothing about either business improves, so the metric flatters deals that may create no value. If the market keeps applying the acquirer's old multiple to the boosted EPS the shares rise, but that rests on misperception rather than economics. The rise proves nothing about success. A low multiple often reflects modest growth prospects rather than failure, and no rule forces the share price anywhere, let alone to double. -
Which of the following correctly describes a forward contract used to hedge a foreign currency payment?
Correct answer: B. Forwards are bank-arranged, tailor-made contracts: the company locks a rate for its exact amount and settlement date, gaining certainty but giving up any favourable spot movement because performance is obligatory for both sides. Exchange trading, standardisation and margining describe futures instead. A right without obligation is an option, which costs a premium precisely because of that asymmetry, and depositing currency today is an element of a money market hedge, not a forward contract. -
Which features distinguish currency futures from forward contracts?
Correct answer: B. The exchange model imposes standard contract sizes and maturity dates, daily revaluation with margin flows, and clearing-house counterparty protection; hedgers typically close positions and take the gain or loss alongside their spot transaction. Customisation to exact amounts and dates is the forward's advantage, not the future's. Access runs through brokers and is unrelated to banking relationships, and the mismatch between standardised contracts and the actual exposure is exactly why basis risk survives. -
Why does an option contract require the buyer to pay a premium, when forwards and futures are entered into at no initial cost?
Correct answer: D. An option's payoff is asymmetric: the holder exercises only when it pays to do so, leaving the writer with obligations that can only hurt them at exercise, so the premium is the price of that asymmetry. Forwards and futures bind both parties symmetrically, which is why they need no upfront payment beyond margin. Options are written by banks and market participants, not governments. The premium is a sunk cost, never refunded, and writers routinely hedge their exposures - nothing prohibits it. -
In a plain vanilla interest rate swap, the two counterparties:
Correct answer: C. A single-currency interest rate swap swaps interest profiles, not funds: the notional exists solely to compute the interest amounts, payments are netted, and each party keeps its own underlying borrowing. Exchanging principal would create pointless credit exposure in the same currency - principal exchange belongs to currency swaps, making option D a different instrument. No lending between the counterparties occurs, and central bank rates are not the mechanism; the floating leg references an agreed market benchmark. -
A company has tendered for an overseas contract and will face a foreign currency receipt only if it wins the bid. Why might a currency option suit this exposure better than a forward contract?
Correct answer: A. The exposure itself is uncertain, so the hedge should be optional too: losing the tender leaves an option holder free to walk away, while a forward would leave an open obligation that must be closed at whatever the spot rate then is, potentially at a loss. The premium makes options the more expensive certainty-equivalent instrument, not cheaper. Nothing outlaws forwards for contingent exposures - they are merely ill-suited - and no financial instrument influences whether the bid succeeds. -
Basis risk in a futures hedge refers to the risk that:
Correct answer: A. The basis is the gap between futures and spot prices; it converges towards zero at expiry but moves unpredictably before then, so a hedge closed early or built on standardised contracts rarely offsets the exposure perfectly. Settlement is guaranteed by the exchange mechanism, so refusal to settle is not the issue. Counterparty default is precisely what the clearing house and margining are designed to neutralise, and stable rates would remove the underlying risk, not create hedge imperfection. -
To hedge a foreign currency receipt due in three months using a money market hedge, a company would:
Correct answer: B. The money market hedge manufactures a forward synthetically: borrowing foreign currency against the future receipt and converting now fixes today's spot rate, with the interest differential between the two money markets determining the effective all-in rate. Buying foreign currency spot would add to a receivable exposure rather than hedge it - that direction suits a future payment. Waiting is simply remaining unhedged, and vaguely selling domestic currency futures does not describe this technique. -
A forward rate agreement (FRA) allows a company planning to borrow in the future to:
Correct answer: D. An FRA is a cash-settled rate lock on a notional amount for a defined future period: whichever way the benchmark moves, the compensation payment brings the company's effective cost back to the agreed rate. It is separate from the actual loan, so it neither guarantees the lending itself - the borrowing is arranged independently - nor removes the need to borrow. No conversion into equity is involved anywhere in the instrument. -
The 'comparative advantage' rationale for an interest rate swap between two companies is that:
Correct answer: C. Where the credit spread between two borrowers differs across the fixed and floating markets, each borrowing in its relatively cheaper market and swapping can leave both paying less than direct borrowing in their preferred form, splitting the spread differential. Interest is redistributed, never eliminated. The mechanism depends on their ratings differing across markets rather than being identical, and the stronger-credit party participates precisely because it also captures part of the saving, not a loss. -
In option terminology, 'delta' measures:
Correct answer: D. Delta is the first-order sensitivity of option value to the underlying price, ranging in magnitude between zero and one for standard options, and it doubles as the hedge ratio in delta hedging because it says how much underlying offsets the option position. Time to expiry is an input to valuation, not delta. The premium-to-spot ratio is merely a cost expression, and sensitivity to interest rates is captured by a different measure, so option C names the wrong risk driver. -
A treasurer hedging a large exposure compares forwards and futures. Which cash flow consideration is specific to the futures hedge?
Correct answer: A. Because futures are revalued daily, adverse moves generate immediate variation margin outflows; the offsetting gain on the underlying exposure is only realised later, so the hedger needs liquidity to carry the position - a genuine practical cost of the futures route. Only initial margin, a small fraction of contract value, is deposited upfront. Forwards settle once at maturity with no interim cash flows, and futures positions certainly can lose money; the daily funding of those losses is precisely the point. -
Value at Risk (VaR) is best described as:
Correct answer: C. VaR compresses risk into one statement: with a chosen probability, losses over the horizon should not exceed the VaR figure. Its weaknesses follow directly - it says nothing about how bad the losses beyond the threshold can be, and it leans on distributional assumptions that can understate extreme events. It is therefore not a maximum possible loss, which option A claims. It guarantees nothing about profits, and it measures potential loss, not average trading income. -
Modigliani and Miller's dividend irrelevance proposition states that, under certain assumptions, dividend policy does not affect shareholder wealth. Those assumptions include:
Correct answer: B. Irrelevance rests on frictionless markets: if selling a few shares costs nothing and is taxed no differently, a shareholder can convert capital value into income at will, so the firm's payout choice adds nothing. Taxes and issue costs are exactly the frictions the theory assumes away - their presence is what makes policy matter in practice. Investment opportunities exist in the model and are assumed to be undertaken regardless of payout, and a systematic preference for dividends is the opposing bird-in-hand argument, not an M&M assumption. -
According to pecking order theory, companies prefer to finance new investment:
Correct answer: B. The ordering follows information asymmetry and issue costs: internal funds require no external scrutiny or fees, debt sends a milder signal and costs less to raise, while a share issue risks being read as management thinking the shares are overvalued and carries the heaviest costs. Option A reverses that order. All-debt financing ignores the theory's starting point of internal funds and the limits of debt capacity, and the theory is about information and cost, not about managing a reported ratio. -
Why do share prices often react strongly to an unexpected cut in a company's dividend?
Correct answer: D. Signalling theory explains the asymmetry between the cash flow effect and the market reaction: managers know more than investors, dividends are a costly, hard-to-fake signal, and a cut suggests the insiders expect leaner times, whatever the official explanation says. The share count is untouched by a dividend decision. No listing rule obliges any particular payout, and dividends are paid from post-tax profits, so cutting them does not raise the company's tax charge. -
The 'clientele effect' in dividend policy suggests that:
Correct answer: C. Retirees and income funds may gravitate to steady payers while growth-oriented and tax-sensitive investors prefer retention; each clientele self-selects, which is an argument for stability and clear communication rather than for any particular payout level. Frequent policy changes are precisely what the effect warns against, since they disrupt the very investors the policy attracted. No rule reserves dividends for institutions, and the effect exists because policy does matter to investors, contradicting blanket irrelevance. -
Trade-off theory describes a company's optimal capital structure as balancing:
Correct answer: A. In the trade-off view, interest tax relief makes debt valuable, but each extra layer of gearing raises the probability and expected cost of distress - lost customers, fire sales, legal costs, managerial distraction - so value is maximised where the marginal tax benefit equals the marginal expected distress cost. Dividend clienteles belong to payout policy, not gearing. Executive pay is a governance topic outside the theory, and maturity matching is a treasury funding principle, not the tax-versus-distress trade-off. -
Compared with paying an increased regular dividend, distributing cash through a share buyback offers which advantage?
Correct answer: D. Markets treat regular dividends as sticky commitments, so companies prefer buybacks for distributing surplus or one-off cash: the amount can be varied or stopped without the negative signal a dividend cut carries, and fewer shares raise earnings per share arithmetically. No permanent price rise is guaranteed - value depends on the price paid and alternatives foregone. The absence of a recurring commitment is the advantage, making option B backwards, and buybacks are publicly disclosed, regulated transactions. -
Modigliani and Miller's capital structure analysis with corporate tax concludes that gearing up adds the value of the interest tax shield. Why do real companies nevertheless stop well short of maximum debt?
Correct answer: B. The with-tax proposition captures the shield but omits the offsetting frictions: distress costs escalate with leverage, lender-imposed constraints bind, and a loss-making company cannot use interest deductions, so the shield's value is not linear all the way up. No statute fixes a general borrowing ceiling for companies. Interest is paid from operating cash flow, not out of share capital, and rating agencies assess and grade risk - they publish opinions, not prohibitions. -
High gearing can create agency conflicts between shareholders and lenders. Which pair of behaviours best illustrates the problem, and what is the lenders' typical response?
Correct answer: C. Once debt is in place, shareholders of a highly geared firm hold something like an option on the assets: risk-shifting inflates the value of their claim at lenders' expense, and near distress they may skip sound investments that mostly shore up the lenders' position. Anticipating this, lenders price protection in and write covenants restricting disposals, distributions and further borrowing. The behaviours in the other options are lender-friendly or neutral, and none of them describes the classic conflict-and-covenant dynamic. -
Purchasing power parity (PPP) predicts that, over time:
Correct answer: C. PPP builds on the law of one price: persistent inflation differentials erode a currency's real purchasing power, and the expected exchange rate movement offsets the differential, making it a standard basis for forecasting rates in project appraisal. The higher-inflation currency weakens, so option B has the direction backwards. Central banks may intervene, but PPP describes market tendencies rather than permanently fixed rates, and the theory's entire content is the inflation-exchange rate link that option D denies. -
The three classic categories of currency exposure faced by a multinational are:
Correct answer: A. The three categories separate the horizons: transaction exposure hits identified near-term cash flows and is the usual target of hedging; translation exposure is an accounting restatement effect with no immediate cash flow; economic exposure is the broadest, covering how currency shifts alter competitiveness even for firms with no foreign invoices. Interest rate, credit and liquidity risks are different risk families altogether, import-export-domestic is not the recognised classification, and spot-forward-futures names instruments rather than exposures. -
Interest rate parity (IRP) links spot and forward exchange rates through:
Correct answer: D. IRP is an arbitrage condition: investing at home must yield the same as converting at spot, investing abroad and locking the return currency conversion in the forward market, so the forward premium or discount mirrors the interest gap - which is why banks price forwards from money market rates. Money supply and trade balances influence currencies over time but are not the forward-pricing mechanism, and IRP operates through market arbitrage rather than through governmental limits on movements. -
When appraising a foreign investment project, the two theoretically equivalent approaches are:
Correct answer: B. Consistency between cash flows and discount rate is the principle: stay in the foreign currency with a foreign-currency-consistent rate and convert the answer at spot, or convert period-by-period at forecast rates (typically derived from parity relationships) and discount at the home rate - done consistently, the two give the same result. Ignoring currency or freezing an historic average builds in error. Mixing payback with NPV is not an equivalence, and an inflation rate is not a risk-adjusted discount rate. -
Which set of measures best mitigates the political and country risk of a large investment in a foreign subsidiary?
Correct answer: D. Effective mitigation changes the host government's incentives and diversifies the exposure: local debt means expropriation hurts local lenders, local partners give domestic stakeholders an interest in the venture's survival, multiple remittance channels reduce dependence on dividend approval, and treaties or insurance provide recourse. Hoarding cash abroad and shunning local employment antagonises the host and is often impractical. Prominence has never immunised investors against expropriation, and pre-emptive litigation is both impossible and diplomatically destructive. -
A host government imposes restrictions on remitting profits to the foreign parent. The most important consequence for investment appraisal is that:
Correct answer: A. From the parent's perspective, value flows from remittable cash: appraisal should model what escapes the restriction, the local reinvestment return on blocked balances, and any terminal release, while contractual channels like royalties and management fees can legitimately move some value. Local profitability still matters - it generates the funds and supports eventual release - so it is not irrelevant. Profit trapped in-country is plainly not the same as profit delivered to shareholders, and abandonment is only rational if the restricted-flow NPV actually turns negative.
Practise another paper
Practice questions FAQ
- Are these real ACCA AFM exam questions?
- No. These are original study questions written to test understanding of the syllabus. They are not real exam questions, exam dumps, or copied from any provider.
- How should I use these AFM practice questions?
- Answer each one, read the explanation (including why the wrong options are wrong), and use the per-area score below to focus your revision. Revisit before exam day.
- Is this enough practice for AFM?
- Treat it as a concept check, not a full mock. Pair it with past papers and specimen exams from ACCA and approved content providers - the real paper also tests longer, applied question styles.
- What score means I am ready?
- A good signal is consistently scoring around 80% or higher across every syllabus area on questions you have not seen before, and being able to explain why the wrong options are wrong.
- Should I use exam dumps?
- No. Dumps (real or leaked questions) breach provider policy, can void your qualification, and do not build the understanding the exam actually tests.