Head-to-head comparison

AWS Developer Associate vs Azure Developer (AZ-204)

By The Exam Atlas Editorial Team · Verified 2026-06-06

Our verdict

These are the same role on two platforms, so the platform decides it more than any feature. Choose the AWS Developer Associate if you build on AWS or want the most portable single credential; choose AZ-204 if you build on Azure, which is common in Microsoft-centric and many European enterprises. Both assume real development experience.

Side by side

The numbers that decide it, lined up across every dimension that matters.

DVA-C02AZ-204
ProviderAmazon Web ServicesMicrosoft Azure
RoleCloud developer (DVA-C02)Cloud developer (AZ-204)
FocusBuilding & deploying apps on AWSBuilding & deploying apps on Azure
LevelIntermediateAdvanced
Exam format65 questions, 130 minutes~40–60 questions, 120 minutes, some case studies
Passing score720 / 1000700 / 1000
Cost (approx.)$150$165 (confirm with Microsoft)
Validity3 years1 year (free online renewal)

Full exam pages: AWS Developer – Associate (DVA-C02) · Azure Developer Associate (AZ-204)

The AWS Developer Associate (DVA-C02) and the Azure Developer Associate (AZ-204) are the same job on two different clouds: proving you can build, deploy and debug applications on the platform. The decision is rarely about which exam is “better” in the abstract; it is about the platform your employers use and where you write code. Here is the detailed comparison, beyond the table above.

The core difference

The AWS Developer Associate is about building cloud-native applications on AWS: serverless with Lambda and API Gateway, data stores like DynamoDB, deployment and CI/CD, security with IAM, KMS and Cognito, and troubleshooting with CloudWatch and X-Ray. It assumes you ship code that uses AWS services well.

The Azure Developer (AZ-204) is about building on Azure: compute through App Service, Functions and containers, storage with Blob and Cosmos DB, security via Microsoft Entra and Key Vault, connecting services through API Management, Event Grid and Service Bus, and monitoring with Application Insights.

So the split is purely platform: the same developer role, the same kinds of skills, expressed in different service names. If you already know which cloud you build on, the choice is largely made.

Cost compared

The two are close on price. The AWS Developer Associate exam is US$150; AZ-204 is around US$165, though pricing varies by country, so confirm current pricing with Microsoft. Neither has a prerequisite or education barrier.

Preparation can be free on both sides: AWS Skill Builder and the official exam guide on the AWS side, and the free Microsoft Learn study guide plus a free Azure account on the Azure side. The meaningful “cost” for either is hands-on time building something real rather than money. Renewal carries no fee on either platform, so cost should not be the deciding factor.

Difficulty and time

Both are demanding because both assume genuine development experience, not just concept recall.

  • AWS Developer Associate is 65 questions in 130 minutes, passing at 720/1000. It is rated intermediate, and AWS expects you to be comfortable reading code and understanding how applications call AWS services. With some AWS exposure, candidates often plan around 60-80 hours; new to AWS, closer to 100-130.
  • AZ-204 is around 40-60 questions in about 120 minutes, passing at 700/1000, and can include case studies. Microsoft rates it as the more advanced of the two and recommends one to two years of development experience plus Azure experience; many candidates spend roughly 8-12 weeks part-time.

Neither is trivially easy. The AWS exam is pitched at intermediate level, while AZ-204 is positioned as advanced and assumes more prior development experience, but in both cases the fastest route is writing code against the SDKs in a free account.

Ecosystem and job market

Job postings mirror the platform split.

  • AWS has the largest overall public-cloud market share, and its certifications are among the most widely referenced, especially at startups, AWS-first companies and across much of the global tech market. The Developer Associate is the more portable single credential and often pairs with the Solutions Architect Associate.
  • Azure is the default in many large enterprises, the public sector, and a large share of German, Austrian and Swiss companies already running Microsoft 365 and Windows Server. In those markets AZ-204 maps directly onto how teams build, and it pairs naturally with AZ-104 or AZ-400.

Demand for cloud developers exists everywhere, but in different proportions by region and industry. Look at the actual employers you are targeting and follow their stack.

Career outcomes

  • AWS Developer Associate maps to: cloud or backend developer, DevOps engineer and application engineer roles on AWS. It commonly follows or pairs with the Solutions Architect Associate, with the DevOps Engineer Professional as a later step.
  • AZ-204 maps to: developer and software-engineering roles in Azure-using organisations, with AZ-400 (DevOps) a common next step and AZ-305 covering the architect path.

Pay tracks the role, market and your engineering ability rather than the badge; both are associate-level developer credentials in a similar band. Multi-cloud literacy is increasingly valued, so some developers add the second platform later, but going deep on one first is the usual route.

How to decide

Choose by platform first, because that decides more than any feature.

  • You build on AWS, or want the single most portable cloud developer credential → AWS Developer Associate.
  • You build on Azure, or work in a Microsoft-centric organisation or region (common across DACH and Europe) → AZ-204.
  • You have no preference at all → AWS is the safer default on market size and portability; AZ-204 is the better bet in a Microsoft-heavy context.

Whichever you pick, the core patterns (serverless, storage, identity, messaging and monitoring) transfer, so the second platform is much faster to learn later. And because both exams assume real development experience, the project you can actually show is what turns the interview into an offer.

Which should you choose?

Choose DVA-C02 if

Developers who write and ship application code on AWS - serverless, APIs and CI/CD - or who want the most widely recognised cloud developer credential.

Choose AZ-204 if

Developers building applications on Azure, especially in Microsoft-centric organisations (common across DACH and Europe) using App Service, Functions and Cosmos DB.

Our specialty · side by side

Related comparisons

Other like-for-like match-ups featuring DVA-C02 or AZ-204.

Where these exams lead

Career paths featuring these exams

See where DVA-C02 and AZ-204 sit in a longer certification sequence.

FAQ

Should I learn AWS or Azure development first?
Pick the platform your target employers actually use. AWS has the largest overall market share and the most portable certification; Azure is common in Microsoft-centric and many European enterprises. The concepts (serverless, storage, identity, messaging) transfer once you know one well.
Do I need to be a strong programmer for either?
Yes, more than for the administrator or architect exams. Both assume real development experience - Microsoft suggests one to two years of coding plus Azure experience for AZ-204, and the AWS exam expects you to read code and understand how apps call AWS services. Neither is a pure coding test, but hands-on building helps a lot.
Why does AZ-204 expire after a year and the AWS Developer after three?
Microsoft renews role-based certifications annually through a free, short, online assessment on Microsoft Learn. AWS uses a three-year cycle, recertified by passing the current exam or a higher-level AWS certification before it expires.
Developer or architect certification - which should I take?
Choose by the work you do. The developer exams (DVA-C02, AZ-204) are for writing and shipping application code; the architect track (AWS SA Professional, AZ-305) is for designing systems. They sit on different roles, not a strict ladder.
Can I put both on my CV?
Yes, and multi-cloud literacy is increasingly valued. Most developers go deep on one platform first, then add the other once comfortable, because the underlying patterns carry over.
Which pays more?
Pay tracks the role, market and your actual engineering ability, not the badge. Both are associate-level developer credentials in a similar band; demonstrable hands-on projects move compensation more than which logo is on the certificate.

Sources